Map how your leadership team makes decisions collectively
Each member completes ten questions independently (two per dimension). Their scores are aggregated into a team profile across five dimensions of judgment quality: revealing where the team is sharp, where blind spots cluster, and where misalignment creates collective decision risk.
10questions / member
2–8participants
0email required
Set up your team scan
Enter your team name and each participant's name. Each person will complete the scan in sequence on this device: or pass the device between team members. Takes about 8 minutes per person.
1
2
3
3 participants
Anonymous and instant. Nothing is stored. Results visible only in this session.
Team Judgment Scan
Question 1 of 5
Question 1 of 5: Calibration & Disconfirmation
Before committing to a high-stakes call, how consistently do you explicitly identify what evidence would change your mind?
Question 2 of 5: Temporal Reasoning
How consistently do you map the second and third-order effects of a consequential decision before committing?
Question 3 of 5: Decoupling
How well do you separate your emotional investment in an outcome from your assessment of the actual situation?
Question 4 of 5: Information Triage
When you are dealing with high volumes of information on a complex issue, how do you distinguish what actually matters from what just feels urgent?
Question 5 of 5: Resolve & Review
After you make a consequential decision, how systematically do you review the quality of your reasoning: not just the outcome, but how you thought?
Question 6 of 10: Calibration & Disconfirmation
When evidence arrives that contradicts a position you have already communicated to your team, how readily do you name the contradiction and update?
Question 7 of 10: Temporal Reasoning
How deliberately do you trace the signal a major decision sends to your best people: not just what it decides, but what it tells them about where things are heading?
Question 8 of 10: Decoupling
When you have publicly championed an initiative and new evidence suggests it is not working, how quickly can you recommend stopping or reversing course?
Question 9 of 10: Information Triage
When someone presents weak evidence with high confidence, how well do you separate the delivery signal from the actual quality of the evidence?
Question 10 of 10: Resolve & Review
When a consequential call you made produces a poor outcome, how clearly do you trace the failure back to your reasoning rather than to circumstance or execution?
✓
Team Judgment Profile
Team scores by dimension
Dimension
Team avg (/ 8)
Signal
Distribution
Team-level decision risk areas
Individual profiles
Full team instrument
Judgment Diagnostic for Teams: Full Report
Twenty-two decision scenarios per member. Individual six-dimension profiles plus a full team aggregate map showing where collective judgment is sharp, where systematic risk clusters, and where to build stronger decision architecture at the team level.
Full six-dimension profile per team member
Team aggregate heatmap: blind spots and strengths
Misalignment analysis: where individual judgment profiles diverge on key dimensions
Facilitated debrief available as an optional add-on