If you measured your board's decision-making before a major change (an AI tool, a new decision-support system, any significant process shift), this is the matching after-state measurement. Use the exact same organization name and change description you used the first time, and we'll automatically match the two records. If this is your first measurement, that's fine too; this result simply becomes your new baseline going forward.
Free results are anonymous. Because this instrument pairs a before/after measurement, purchasing a report keeps an organization-level record on file; see how we handle data.
Les résultats gratuits sont anonymes. Parce que cet instrument associe une mesure avant/après, l'achat d'un rapport conserve un enregistrement au niveau de l'organisation; voir comment nous traitons les données.
Each dimension is scored on a continuous scale, not a binary high or low. Read these before you start; the most accurate results come from answering the construct as defined here, not as you infer it. This is the same six-dimension instrument used in the standalone Judgment Diagnostic and in the pre-instrument baseline; here, it's framed specifically as an after-state measurement, so it can be compared directly against your baseline if one exists.
The degree to which your confidence in a judgment matches your actual accuracy. Well-calibrated people say "I'm 70% sure" and are right about 70% of the time; they neither overclaim certainty nor undersell genuine knowledge.
The willingness and ability to actively seek evidence that challenges a current belief, and to revise that belief when the evidence warrants it. Distinct from "open-mindedness"; this is an active behavior, not a disposition.
The ability to reason across multiple time horizons at once and trace second-order effects: what happens as a consequence of the consequence. Distinguishes those who optimize for now from those who play the long game.
The ability to evaluate a decision on its merits without the distortion of ego investment, identity attachment, or emotional state. High decouplers can change their mind without experiencing it as a defeat.
The ability to correctly identify which information is decision-relevant, weight it appropriately, and discard noise, particularly under information overload. Distinct from intelligence; this is executive function under pressure.
The willingness to commit to a decision when information is incomplete, and to own the outcome. Distinct from recklessness; high Resolve includes accepting the decision may be wrong while still making it.
Le degré auquel votre confiance dans un jugement correspond à votre précision réelle. Les personnes bien calibrées disent « je suis sûr à 70 % » et ont raison environ 70 % du temps; elles ne revendiquent ni une certitude excessive, ni ne sous-estiment une connaissance genuine.
La volonté et la capacité de chercher activement des preuves qui remettent en question une croyance actuelle, et de réviser cette croyance quand les preuves le justifient. Distinct de l'« ouverture d'esprit »; c'est un comportement actif, pas une disposition.
La capacité de raisonner simultanément sur plusieurs horizons temporels et de tracer les effets de second ordre: ce qui se passe comme conséquence de la conséquence. Distingue ceux qui optimisent pour maintenant de ceux qui jouent sur le long terme.
La capacité d'évaluer une décision selon ses mérites sans la distorsion de l'investissement de l'ego, de l'attachement identitaire ou de l'état émotionnel. Les personnes à haut découplage peuvent changer d'avis sans le vivre comme une défaite.
La capacité d'identifier correctement quelle information est pertinente pour la décision, de la pondérer de manière appropriée et d'éliminer le bruit, en particulier sous surcharge d'information. Distinct de l'intelligence ; c'est une fonction exécutive sous pression.
La volonté de s'engager dans une décision quand l'information est incomplète, et d'assumer le résultat. Distinct de la témérité; une haute résolution implique d'accepter que la décision puisse être erronée tout en la prenant quand même.
The label above is the door. The full report is the room: a written synthesis of how your two or three most extreme dimensions interact in real decisions, three concrete development actions per dimension, and an interpreted read of your response patterns. If a matching pre-instrument baseline is on file for this organization and change, your report also includes a before/after delta across all six dimensions.